Viewpro tested and approved this aircraft in Thailand on 21 Nov 2025. 62 days later, the left motor arm detached in flight. Viewpro was contacted with full evidence and refused to accept responsibility.
Post-crash documentation showing structural damage to the airframe and components.
On 6 February 2026, during the second flight of the day, the left vertical motor arm of a Viewpro eVT360 detached in flight at approximately 80 meters AGL. The aircraft lost lift on the left side and dropped rapidly. The emergency landing protocol (QLAND) was triggered automatically.
The aircraft was tested by the manufacturer (Viewpro) on 21 November 2025 and received in Mexico on 6 December 2025 — only 62 days before the incident.
The ArduPilot flight log shows that the flight controller detected a developing mechanical problem on the left arm 83 seconds before the catastrophic failure and was actively compensating by increasing power to motors C2 and C3. At the moment of failure, both left-arm motors were at full saturation (1,949 PWM) with zero response — confirming the arm was no longer attached to the airframe.
Values in PWM microseconds. C1 = front-right, C2 = rear-left (failed arm), C3 = front-left (failed arm), C4 = rear-right, C5 = forward cruise motor.
| Time (s) | C1 (FR) | C2 (RL) ⚠️ | C3 (FL) ⚠️ | C4 (RR) | C5 | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,584.24 | 1,520 | 1,540 | 1,650 | 1,510 | 1,490 | Asymmetry onset |
| 3,620.00 | 1,530 | 1,580 | 1,720 | 1,520 | 1,500 | C3 escalating |
| 3,650.00 | 1,540 | 1,650 | 1,810 | 1,530 | 1,510 | C3 near saturation |
| 3,667.07 | 1,530 | 1,750 | 1,882 | 1,520 | 1,520 | FBWA transition |
| 3,667.23 | 1,540 | 1,840 | 1,923 | 1,520 | 1,510 | Arm detaches |
| 3,667.43 | 1,470 | 1,848 | 1,949 | 1,460 | 1,440 | C2 begins saturation |
| 3,667.51+ | 1,320 | 1,949 | 1,949 | 1,290 | 1,280 | Both left motors at max — no response |
The ArduPilot flight log (00000031.BIN) recorded all telemetry data during the incident. The analysis shows:
1. Evidence of progressive mechanical failure: The flight controller did not "decide" to crash. It detected a growing imbalance on the left arm and attempted to compensate by increasing motor power — exactly as ArduPilot is programmed to do. When the structure failed, even maximum power to two motors could not keep the aircraft airborne.
2. No pilot error or software fault: There were no aggressive maneuvers, anomalous commands, or sensor failures. The first flight (1,849 to 2,454 s) was uneventful. The second mission was proceeding normally up to the moment of failure.
3. Aircraft was virtually new: The eVT360 was factory-tested by Viewpro on 21 November 2025 and delivered on 6 December 2025. The incident occurred 62 days after delivery — well within any reasonable expectation of structural integrity.
4. Manufacturer's response: Viewpro was contacted with the complete flight log, flight log analysis, and photographic documentation of the failure. The company declined to accept responsibility for the structural defect that caused the crash.
The aircraft was purchased and paid in full via direct wire transfer (no marketplace intermediary). The manufacturer was contacted with complete technical documentation: .BIN flight log, incident analysis report, damage photos, and a detailed factual description of events.
The company's response was to decline any responsibility for the structural defect, despite objective evidence that the arm detached due to a manufacturing or material failure — not pilot error or misuse.
The full purchase price was not refunded. The Chinese manufacturer, operating outside Brazilian jurisdiction, offers no effective recourse channel for foreign customers.
Timeline: Factory test → 21 Nov 2025 • Delivery → 6 Dec 2025 • Incident → 6 Feb 2026
The aircraft was 62 days old when the arm detached in flight.
The ArduPilot flight log shows, without ambiguity, that the Viewpro eVT360 suffered an in-flight structural failure: the left vertical motor arm detached from the airframe due to a manufacturing defect or material fatigue.
The flight controller detected the problem 83 seconds in advance and attempted to compensate — unsuccessfully, because the failure was mechanical and unrecoverable. Fortunately, there were no injuries or third-party damage.
Viewpro was notified with all evidence and chose not to accept responsibility.
Raw flight data available: Complete ArduPilot flight log (.BIN, 495 GPS points, full motor output history, and system events) is available for independent verification upon request.